This is now the de facto standard for releasing jar files in the OSS projects I'm involved with, mainly due to maven and overall clarity/convenience.
Stephen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glanville, Jay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hello All. Silly (or insignificant) question time. Back in January for Collections 3.0, the deployed binary jar file had it's filename changed to include it's version number. (e.g.: commons-collection-3.0.jar) What was the reasons for this change? I believe I know the answers to this question, but my co-worker needs to hear it from the source. Thanks. -- Jay Glanville --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
