> frankly I just don't understand the mentality that says it's a good
> thing to *not* share components that were designed from the get-go
> to be shared.
I think that someone had a good idea to suggest that if package X depends
upon package Y, and wants to ship a stripped down Y, it could put out its
own X-Y JAR file, which could be replaced by the full Y package.
That makes this a packaging issue (which it is), and preserves code sharing
at the source level.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
