Brent Verner wrote:
BTW, is there any reason that PropertiesConfiguration should
not be made to be compliant with java.util.Properties files?
I'm aware of the current duplicate-keys-create-lists behaviour, but IMO, it would be best to have the _same_ semantics as the
java.util.Properties files. There is no reason we couldn't have
the current custom-parsed properties file provider along
side a standard Properties file provider.
Interesting point, we use the .properties extension for PropertiesConfiguration but the extended syntax makes it incompatible with the good old java.util.Properties. Should we encourage the use of a different extension for extended properties to make it clear it's a different format ?
Emmanuel Bourg
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
