DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28912>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28912 Connection re-use conflates logical and physical connections ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-25 12:11 ------- I'm not certain I get the idea -- why would anyone want the non-guarded behavior? It's like a dangling pointer bug, where one part of the code holds on to a pointer to memory some other part has freed. Somone holding a reference under the old logical connection ends up refering to a new logical connection by accident, not design. At least this guarded behavior should be the default, but I'm not sure why it's ever right for user code to be unguarded. What am I missing? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
