> -----Original Message----- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 2:34 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [all] Instead of source and binary - one distribution > > > > --- Tim O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We make releases both source and binary, but why not just start cutting > > one > > release? I can understand why a product like HTTPD would be distributed > > without source, but the commons community consists of developers. > > > > Can anyone think of any good reason to preserve the current release > > structure. > > Even though we distribute to developers, most of them probably don't care > about the source. They care about adding the jar to their project and > looking at the javadocs. I just downloaded codec for use in one of my > projects and would have immmediately thrown away the source if it was > included. IMO, it's a waste of Apache's bandwidth to distribute files > users are just going to delete.
+1. I am firmly against throwing everything into a single distribution. I thought we just had this discussion a few weeks ago, anyway... -- Martin Cooper > > David > > > > > My apologizes in advance if this starts an endless flame war. I have a > > knack for that. > > > > ----- > > Tim O'Brien > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. > http://messenger.yahoo.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
