Hi, Much to my surprise I recently discovered that the pattern "*" doesn't work as a completely wild patternmatch in the RulesBase matching engine.
So attached is a patch that adds support for this, together with unit tests. I'm posting this rather than just committing the patch because I'm wondering why this wasn't done before, and whether there is some good reason that I have overlooked for *not* supporting this. However I can't think of one. And all the existing unit tests for RulesBase still work fine with this patch applied. If no-one objects within the next few days, I will commit this patch. Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
