No, but that makes sense.
I can't think of any reason why you'd want it to be true? The content of the attribute element is already encoded to the same level you'd need in the attribute, and this change makes the behaviour consistent with XSLT's attribute tag.
Cheers, Brett
Dion Gillard wrote:
Is there an encode property on the attribute tag? I really think it's something we could do with across all tags, like trim.
On 10 Jul 2004 02:15:39 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
brett 2004/07/09 19:15:39
Modified: jelly/jelly-tags/xml/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/xml AttributeTag.java Log: Don't encode the conents of the attribute
Revision Changes Path 1.5 +2 -2 jakarta-commons/jelly/jelly-tags/xml/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/xml/AttributeTag.java
Index: AttributeTag.java =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-commons/jelly/jelly-tags/xml/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/xml/AttributeTag.java,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- AttributeTag.java 25 Feb 2004 01:31:50 -0000 1.4 +++ AttributeTag.java 10 Jul 2004 02:15:39 -0000 1.5 @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ if ( tag == null ) { throw new JellyTagException( "<attribute> tag must be enclosed inside an <element> tag" ); } - tag.setAttributeValue( getName(), getBodyText() ); + tag.setAttributeValue( getName(), getBodyText( false ) ); }
// Properties
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
