> Baum, Karl wrote:
>
> >[snip]For the most part though, all good caching implementations only
> >expose a get,put, and remove to the application.
> >
> That much of the problem sounds a lot like an implementation of
> java.util.Map to me ...

ie. all thats needed is to get all the caching projects to implement the Map
interface and there is no need for a commons-caching.

Also, you should know that I wouldn't support developing a web/GUI-based
caching administraion interface in commons. Its not what commons is about.

Stephen


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to