Can you supply a test case demonstrating the problem please ;-) The serialization aspects were new in collections 3.1 so may have an odd bug.
Stephen --- Marc Jambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > > I have met a strange problem while > serializing/deserializing LRUMaps. > > I am performing the following operations in my code: > 1) If serialized file exists, deserialize LRUMap > 2) Fill LRUMap > 3) Serialize LRUMap to file > > I run my program several times, and the memory is > growing over and over > at each run ! After 10 runs the deserialization of a > file of 1850 bytes > ends up in taking 300megs in memory. The strange > thing is that : > > * The number of entries is the same each time > * The size of the file cache on disk is always the > same (though the file > is modified) > > I replaced the LRUMap with a classical HashMap and > do not have any > memory problem. > > Any clue ? Is there some kind of memory leak ? > > Thanks! > > > -- > o----------------------------------o > | Marc Jambert | > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > | | > | (tel) 05-67-77-19-72 | > | (fax) 05-67-77-19-98 | > o----------------------------------o > | Vega Technologies | > o----------------------------------o > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
