On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 21:22, robert burrell donkin wrote: > i am suspect that it would be possible to use byte-code engineering to > wire up alternative implementations. the logging code wouldn't be > stripped but rather a new implementation would be wired in. of course, > the problem with this is that users would need to re-enhance the > library rather than reconfigure if they wanted to change targets.
I also think that dynamically generating the logging "bridge" would be worth experimenting with. And it would be a cool project! I've had this in the back of my mind for a while, and hope to look into this sometime, but it won't be in the next few months. And while this might help with classloader issues, it will not remove the need for a commons-logging library. Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
