Date: 2004-09-06T18:39:22
Editor: DionGillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki
Page: JEXL
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/JEXL
no comment
Change Log:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -8,25 +8,8 @@
= TODO =
-JEXL has been sitting around for some time (some might say, it has been languishing).
A few projects (such as Jelly) use it, but more would use it if it were fully
releases. Plus, components in commons proper should be released. So, let's make a
release of JEXL sooner rather than later, here's the process:
-
- * '''Code review for any outstanding issues''' - We need to give JEXL a once over to
make sure there are no obvious outstanding issues or bugs that need fixing. (DONE)
- * '''Call for Comments''' - Once we are certain there are no outstanding issues,
call for comments on commons-dev. (DONE)
- * '''Cut a release'''
- * '''Publish to Maven repo'''
-
-So, this is somewhat ridiculous because components in Commons Proper should be
released (or at least have a solid release plan). Let's get on this, what needs to be
done?:
-
* '''Documentation'''
- * '''Syntax Page''' - We need a page devoted to syntax, preferably we'll have an
explanation of the syntax and a big table with some examples.
- * Mostly done
- * '''Examples Page''' - Keep the small example on the front page, we'll need a
quick page that reads like a small user's guide with a section demonstrating every
usage situation.
- * Placeholder created
* '''Related Resources on Index Page''' - Develop this related resources section
put some more links to Velocity resources.
- * '''package.html''' - Some of the packages have package.html content. We need to
make sure that a developer has the necessary tools to use Jexl from the Javadoc alone.
- * '''JavaDoc''' - We need some explanation about Pre and Post resolvers. Esp. why
and how someone would ever want to use them. Also, keep an eye out for informal
JavaDoc - the jexl package had some JavaDoc that sounded like development planning.
* '''Refactoring'''
- * '''Unused Classes''' - There was one class (sort sort of LogAdapter) which was
not referenced in thie commons-jexl project. Make sure that each class in jexl is
relevant.
- * Other than unused parser classes, all now appear to be used.
* '''General Refactoring''' - How's that for a catch all bullet point?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
