DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31091>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31091 Collection inside Abstract[AnyCollection]Decorator really needed to be transient? Summary: Collection inside Abstract[AnyCollection]Decorator really needed to be transient? Product: Commons Version: 3.1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: Collections AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I would like to know if there was any good reason for all abstract decorator classes (like AbstractMapDecorator) to have their decorated collection (map) transient? It doesn't help when trying to store decorated collections with XStream for example... Maybe there's a -really- good reason but I can't see it. thanks a lot and go on with the good work! :) Xavier. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
