Henri Yandell wrote:
Some thoughts from a general Commons perspective:
Thanks!
1) +0, This is worth getting right early on as package renaming does tend to confuse users and takes a long time to work through deprecation etc.
Ugh.. Lots of change incompatible with RC1 here...but if others agree...
What I dont understand is why the concept of univariate vs. multivariate is hard to understand. Univariate - sample consists of a single array of data (one random variable / distribution); multivariate - sample has more than on column (random vector / joint distribution).
Thought about this some more and it is not worth arguing about. If it is not clear, we should change it. If there are no objections, I will change .univariate to .descriptive and .multivariate to .regression.
Phil
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
