There isn't a javascript url validation yet. I'm not concerned at all
about the performance of the regex. We just need it to work in all cases
and tune it if there's a performance problem later.
David
--- Tim Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Have you used the proposed patch for your projects?
> No. I was evaluating validator or really just a handful of classes
> from validator when I stumbled upon my basic test case failing.
> Instead of just filing a bug I decided to track it down, and sent
> patches too!
>
> > I can take some time
> > this week to look at it.
> Great. I know I sounded unconfident about the patch, actually its that
> I'm not confident that with the addition of * its most efficient
> regular expression. I know little to nothing about how regex engines
> reduce the expressions and evaluate them. But I'm confident regarding
> the addition of 'zero or more' clause from Martin's comments and also
> looking at the spec Martin referenced. Also the thoroughness of the
> test cases.
>
> I'll integrate this class into my project (why not.) I'm still not
> finding where the js counter-part for this lives?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
