On Tuesday 28 September 2004 7:11 am, Rory Winston wrote:
> Steve,
>
> This sounds like it could be the way forward. This way, the user doesn't
> have to specify anything extra unless they really need to. The only
> question is, do we generate regexes on the fly, or pull out the enire date
> string? I would be inclined to go for the latter option.

Me too.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 September 2004 12:24
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [NET] Designing a Date Format-aware FTP Entry Parser
>
> On Monday 27 September 2004 7:50 am, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
> > Steve Cohen wrote:
> > >I created a hypothetical French user
> > >named Jacques on my system, gave him "LANG" of "fr_FR", logged in as
> > > him, and got French directory listings, although the dates were of the
> > > form jui 7
> > >rather than
> > >7 jui
> >
> > So it is as i thought - at least for the unix like ftp server. The date
> > format isnt really true locale-specific, only the month name is
> > converted. I am not sure if it is worth to implement the whole date stuff
> > just to handle the month name - we could achieve the same by simply
> > provide a static month-name list and a
> > static addMonth(String name, int number) which one can use to add some
> > month-names we do not maintain in our default list.
>
> Locale + SimpleDateFormat provides an easier way to do this.  A
> SimpleDateFormat is constructed with the Locale as a parameter and then
> SimpleDateFormat.getShortMonthNames() provides a list of month
> abbreviations for that locale.
>
> Another option, though, is NOT to use regular expressions for the date
> parsing at all.  Let the regex pull out the entire date portion and then
> parse that with the SimpleDateFormat.
>
> > This is fairly easy to implement.
> > But i dont know what Rory found for NT and therefore i dont know if this
> > might work there too.
> >
> > >It seems to me that we might need no other identifier than Locale.  I
> > > would caution once again that we not get this mixed up with SYST.  I
> > > would proceed for now as though there is no way to automate this. 
> > > Later if we find such a way we can build for it.
> >
> > But you found that the french date wasnt relly printed in its typical
> > manner, maybe another server will do.
> > So it is possible you might end up in two French locale definitions and
> > then the user has to encode this fact into the locale name e.g "fr_FR"
> > and "fr_FR_xyzserver".
> > For sure, in this case my proposed solution might not work too.
> >
> > The question is: Are there server where the date parts are really
> > printed in different order depending on the locale?
>
> That is not what I meant when I said we might need no other IDENTIFIER than
> a locale.  That is, if the user supplied "fr_FR" we would construct a
> SimpleDateFormat("MMM dd", new Locale("fr", "FR"))
> and if he supplied "en_US" we would construct thus:
> SimpleDateFormat("MMM dd", new Locale("en", "US"))
>
> That is to say, we would NOT infer date-month-year ordering from the
> locale, at least for the unix-like parsers.
>
> But there would be a way for the user to supply the date format string as
> well as locale so as to get
> SimpleDateFormat("dd MMM", new Locale("fr", "FR"))
> if it is required.
>
> All this setting would go on as setters on a factory class that the user
> would not have to use.  If they didn't setLocale, en_US would be the
> default. If they setLocale but not either date recent or older date format,
> then the standard US ordering would be used but the Locale month names.  If
> they specified Locale and older date format, we could infer the newer date
> format as well.  And if they specified everything, we could handle that
> case too.
>
> > What date problems do have users reported till today?
> > Acutally i only read the aix language problem (and seen your french
> > test).
>
> We seem to see one or two of these a year.
>
> > ---
> > Mario
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to