I see that java.lang.Number declares java.io.Serializable. Number subclasses in java.lang do not but each of our Mutable number classes does. This does not seem necessary. Am I missing something? Can we remove these extra declarations?
I guess it depends on how likely we think it is that a user would want to serialize a Mutable Number. Does serialization create maintenance issues that we'd rather avoid? I'm not sure, and don't feel strongly about either choice.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
