Hi fellows, Eric Pugh wrote on Thursday, October 21, 2004 4:30 PM:
> I think both arguments are valid. It depends on your use > case. [snip] > Could we have two interfaces? Configuration and > StrictConfiguration? StrictConfiguration would declare > checked methods? What about a monitor concept? Logging itself is useless, the application cannot react. Throwing checked exceptions is annoying for the memory or file based configurations (i.e. nothing can really fail after the file is read). Registering a listener for a Configuration, that supports error events may solve these problems. Probably a logging listener should be provided by default. Regards, J�rg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
