I just ran the tests and it looks like you forgot to commit outputData.jelly.
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:30:46 +0200, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As, in my head, this was mostly be overridden by "receiving"
> subclasses, I didn't really care.
>
> I have done as you suggest, though, and, indeed, it makes the MuteTag
> better: this one can now avoid the toString of such things as the
> result of a Jexl expression, some speed improvement I think.
> Also, the jexl expressions now output into the XMLOutput through
> objectData(o) which means that such expressions will be usable to feed
> "as a result".
>
> One thing that would be lovely is to have all the parents of arg tags
> use this (and have arg tag use it)... are there some strong wishes to
> have the following:
> <j:new className="myClass">${a}${b}</j:new> ?
> or
> <j:list>${a}${b}${c}</j:list>
> ??
> Both would be easy with it.
I don't think just using a variable as the delimiter is the best way
to define args. Something else maybe, but not just variables.
>
> paul
>
> Le 28 oct. 04, � 22:20, Dion Gillard a �crit :
>
>
>
> > I thought we were going to make the default behaviour of that method
> > to write the object.toString() to the output?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:13:25 +0200, Paul Libbrecht
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Done that, thanks for the precision. I was unclear from the last
> >> mails.
> >> I feared for a while at the amount of checkstyle complaints... did
> >> anyone pay attention to them ? It seems quite of an annoying task!
> >> Maybe it would be simper to relax the requirements ?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
