Definitly check with the dumbster guy as well. Maybe we need to try CVS head? urgh.. Or, be really icky and not run the test on *NIX?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 2:01 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [email] Steps prior to graduating from Sandbox > > > I can confirm that the timeout on unix (at least osx isn't the only > problem with this dumpster business). > > I cranked things up to 20000 and still had the getMailSession method > failing . Increasing timeout to 1000 does stop the error for Email > tests but all subsquent tests the same old jazz. > > I'll try and get some time this evening to see whether I can > contribute anything more constructive. > > Mark > > On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 07:29:14 -0500, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Eric Pugh wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I started updating the Status.html doc. I wanted to make > sure we have a > > > consensus on steps prior to proposing to graduate from the sandbox: > > > > > > 1) Remove commons-validator. > > > 2) Verify unit tests (dumbster) run on *NIX boxes > > > 3) Documentation enhancements? > > > > > > Does this look good? > > > > > > Eric > > > > > > > I'm not sure about the normal criteria for things to move out of the > > sandbox, but here are my thoughts on things: > > 1. SimpleEmail - works well, easy to use > > 2. MultipartEmail - not as easy to use, very flexible > > 3. HtmlEmail - still broken. if, for instance, you create an html email > > with 2 embedded jpeg files, you end up with this structure: > > > > multipart/related > > text/html > > image/jpeg > > image/jpeg > > text/plain > > > > which will not display properly with many email clients. we really want: > > > > multipart/alternative > > text/plain > > multipart/related > > text/html > > image/jpeg > > image/jpeg > > > > or, if there are email attachments, something like: > > > > multipart/mixed > > multipart/alternative > > text/plain > > multipart/related > > text/html > > image/jpeg > > image/jpeg > > attachment1-content-type > > attachment2-content-type > > > > I'll try to come up with a patch that addresses this. Again, I'm not > > sure if this affects the decision to move commons-email out of sandbox, > > but I thought it was worth mentioning. Also, its nice to see the all of > > the recent work on the project :), thanks! > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
