It tanks on the download of the javamail jars. I am thinking of just putting a /lib/javamail.jar and then having maven jar override map it, and hopefully the Ant plugin will pick it up, or just tweak the plugin afterwords to point to it.
Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 10:20 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [general][email] Time for Commons Email to exist Sandbox? > > > On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 21:48:00 +0100, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think on that front, we are ready. We are tiding up a unit test and > > figuring out the best ant build script. So, if we move out of > sandbox, I > > think 1.0 would be days away from being VOTE'd on... > > I probably missed some discussion on this, but what needs to be > figured out about an Ant build script? Can you not simply use the one > generated by Maven? > > -- > Martin Cooper > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 8:29 PM > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > > Subject: Re: [general][email] Time for Commons Email to exist Sandbox? > > > > > > > > > Main criteria are community and readiness for 1.0. Getting a 1.0 > > > immediately > > > after promotion is actually really quite important. > > > > > > Stephen > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Eric Pugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > While not calling for a formal vote, I wanted to gather > feedback on any > > > > issues that would bar allows commons-email to exit the sandbox. > > > For those > > > > of you not familiar with it, commons-email is an attempt to > provide a > > > > lightweight simple library for sending emails using the > > > JavaMail library. > > > > Text, HTML, and attachement type emails are supported. > > > > > > > > This code was originally written for Turbine, and is therefore quite > > > mature. > > > > Since then it has been langushing in Sandbox until some new > contributors > > > > have started submitting patches. > > > > > > > > I feel that this code is very close to being ready for a 1.0, > > > and all the > > > > remains is some polishing of Ant script and promotion out of > > > the Sandbox. > > > > > > > > The only "issue" I can raise is that while there are two Emeritus > > > > committers, John McNally and Jon Stevens, I am the only > active Commons > > > > committer working on [email]. However, we have some active > > > contributors, > > > > specifically Mark Lowe and Corey Scott who have provided > unit tests and > > > > testing. I think that getting [email] out of the sandbox > will allow it > > > to > > > > grow. > > > > > > > > Please send me your feedback, and, assuming the perspective > is postive, > > > I'll > > > > call for a formal VOTE promotion later this week. > > > > > > > > I have updated the docs showing the increased code coverage etc: > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/email/ > > > > > > > > Eric Pugh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
