--- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it be better to call the version 1.3.1.1?
>
> I'm just thinking that its going to confuse people using the 1.3.1
> version
> DTD with a 1.4.1 version?
I think you've got your versions mixed up :-). IMO, the release should be
called 1.1.4 because that comes after 1.1.3. This is a bugfix release so
it shouldn't be surprising that the dtd is the same as the last version.
David
>
> Niall
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 8:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Validator] Next Release
>
> > I think releasing a 1.1.4 is a good idea. This will give users yet
> > another opportunity to notice the arg0-4 deprecation and change their
> xml
> > accordingly. That will make for a smooth upgrade to 1.2.0 when it's
> > finally released.
> >
> > If you cut a release, please update the changes.xml file because we're
> > using that as our release notes. I usually update this file at the
> same
> > time as making a code change or fixing a bug.
> >
> > Thanks so much for volunteering on validator Niall!
> >
> > David
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
