OK, do not know why but after a while I was just convinced: I will start a vote for a release candicate :)
Oliver P.S.: Robert do you have any telepathic skills? ;) On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:26:18 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:37:27 +0000, robert burrell donkin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > same with the release. it's usually best to push out a release > > candidate first follow later by the release. the initial stage would be > > for someone to propose someone to act as release manager. > > Thanks for your continued help! > > I thought you become the release manager just by managing the release, > i.e. by doing it? Who would vote against someone who is willing to do > the non-fun administrative part? > > The Slide project uses the latest code of commons transaction and all > we can say it works as expected. Are there any reasons I do not see > for releasing a release candidate first? I mean I do not think right > now there are *that* many people that would use and thus check it > except the Slide project - which already has. > > Oliver > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
