But why not just release 1.0? All but Matt seemed quite happy with the current API, and as many folks including myself are using it in production, I think we should stick to what has proven to work quite nicely.
Don On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:57:07 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about if we tag and roll a 0.2.0 "test build" now, so that we have a > basis of comparison. > > There are applications in play now that are using Chain as it is, and this > would give them something to use while we revisit the API. > > I think the last thing we want to do is consider significant API changes > without rolling some type of release first. > > -Ted. > > PS - Can we keep a "[chain]" marker in any threads, including [VOTE] threads? > It helps with the filtering. > > -T. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
