Craig McClanahan wrote: > This sounds like a good opportunity for a custom LogFactory > implementation that manages its own hierarchy of loggers, so that you > can create document-specific instances as necessary. > > The way that the default LogFactory implemenation interprets the > string or class argument to the getLog() method is just that -- a > default. You can replace it with anything you need, so you can > accomplish what you're after in this particular use case.
But the default implementation does, what I want. It's just that I cannot determin the name of the logger. Since such a "getName" is missing in the Log interface, another LogFactory will not help. - J�rg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
