DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32369>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32369 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-30 20:34 ------- As the implementor of the discovery dependencies on the class loader, I believe that I have a reasonable expectation that ClassLoaders adhere to the behavior described in the documentation. There is no clear indication that the getResource method is optional. The counter argument is, IMHO, an interesting point of debate, but avoids the question of reasonable expectation... That said, I acknowledge that you have a problem. I'm not sure how to resolve your problem... but am willing to discuss alternate designs if someone has a suggestion. If the discovery community can determine a reasonable design based on your scenario, we would be in a position to accept volunteer work to implement that design :-) Just to level set - the discovery process is *centered* around the idea of obtaining a "name" that describes the discovered resources, and the idea of using an "URL" for that name is intuitively correct... I might argue that in fact if your ClassLoader cannot return a "name"/URL, then it's resources are not "discoverable" in this level. In that interpretation, it works as expected. Any suggestions? <ras> -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
