Per my other email, can we use a better name? maybe something like interpolateProperty? It doesn't have to be a JavaBean style getter since we don't expect it to be called by external tools..
> -----Original Message----- > From: Emmanuel Bourg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 10:16 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [configuration] getProperty vs getPropertyDirect > > > Sorry Olivier I should have waited a bit more before comiting the change > :/ I have no problem reintroducing getPropertyDirect at a later time if > you find an interesting use case. > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > Oliver Heger wrote: > > After seeing the commit mails I may be a bit late. > > > > I had some ideas about extending the interpolation mechanism to support > > other data types than string, too. For this use case the separation of > > getProperty() and getPropertyDirect() would be nice, as getProperty() > > being a generic hook that allows for manipulation of properties (like > > interpolation) before they are delivered to the caller. > > > > But this was nothing concrete yet. > > > > Oliver > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
