DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32663>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32663 Summary: Why are the methods of TTest not static? Product: Commons Version: 1.0 Final Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Math AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To do T-tests on data -- for which many thanks! -- you currently have to do the following TTest tester = new TTestImpl(); tester.pairedTTest( ... ); There are two things that are inelegant about this implementation: you have to explicitly call "new TTestImpl()" instead of using a factory method, and I don't see why there's this whole interface-implementation paradigm at all. As far as I can see, there's no state stored in the TTest implementation; why isn't it a singleton class with static methods instead? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
