+1 Stephen --- Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If there are any [id] devs watching, do they think > it might be > worthwhile removing the explicit dependency on > [codec]? The only > portions of codec which are used in [id] are the Hex > encoding and the > MD5/SHA-1 encoding routines. The hex encoding is > trivial and could be > imported to the [id] codebase, and the MD5/SHA-1 > routines just delegate > to the JDK methods anyways, so it seems a bit > pointless. > > Anyone got any objections? > > Cheers, > Rory > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
