On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:02:14 -0500, Tim O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 1. Scheduling: If we go forward with this migration, we need to do this > when everyone is available both so we can migrate successfully and so > that we can have a proper 72 hour vote window. Doing this right before > a holiday weekend is not the best idea, and I think we could use some > more time to work out other issues like security and site publishing.
Craig's nightlies. Gump. > The earliest I can see is a vote thread next week starting on the 27th > or 28th, ending on the 30th. That leaves us with the posssibility of a > five to six hour migration on new years' eve or day which might work out So either a drunk infra team or a hungover one.... Bear in mind, this would just be the test migration on asf hardware, and we could then leave it open for a set time period for people to play with. > well. Was thinking this qualifies again as a "release" majority vote. At first I thought that it should be consensus, ie) no -1's, but I'm seeing your thinking now. We have two types of -1; firstly there's a "-1 because I like CVS and want to stay there"; secondly there's a "-1 because I can't use SVN in the way I need to". The former should be treated as a majority vote, while the latter should be treated as a consensus vote. So I'm +1 to a "release" majority vote with the acceptance that we're not going to leave anyone behind. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
