Henning,

Thank you for  sharing your mind.  You have the  right to pooh-pooh my
opinions as much I have the  right to express them.  I still happen to
think   that  the  X.25   TCP/IP  analogy   bears  relevance   to  the
discussion. The fact that a simple analogy was sufficient to push your
buttons should tell you something.

At 09:04 AM 12/21/2004, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
Ceki =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FClc=FC?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>all the attempts  made at bridging X.25 and  TCP/IP, both well defined
>and  stable protocols,  have  failed miserably,  even  if both  stacks
>supposedly fit into layers 1-4 of the 7 layer OSI network model.

But X.25 and TCP/IP use two completely different paradigms ("always
deliver" vs. "best effort"). BTDTGTT.

This is like saying "a good football player should also be a good
basketball player, because both are games played with a ball".

If this is the level to which this discussion will degrade, it makes
no sense to discuss. You are (once again) comparing apples to
pears.

        Regards
                Henning

-- Ceki G�lc�

  The complete log4j manual: http://qos.ch/log4j/



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to