Henning,
Thank you for sharing your mind. You have the right to pooh-pooh my opinions as much I have the right to express them. I still happen to think that the X.25 TCP/IP analogy bears relevance to the discussion. The fact that a simple analogy was sufficient to push your buttons should tell you something.
At 09:04 AM 12/21/2004, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
Ceki =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FClc=FC?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>all the attempts made at bridging X.25 and TCP/IP, both well defined >and stable protocols, have failed miserably, even if both stacks >supposedly fit into layers 1-4 of the 7 layer OSI network model.
But X.25 and TCP/IP use two completely different paradigms ("always deliver" vs. "best effort"). BTDTGTT.
This is like saying "a good football player should also be a good basketball player, because both are games played with a ball".
If this is the level to which this discussion will degrade, it makes no sense to discuss. You are (once again) comparing apples to pears.
Regards Henning
-- Ceki G�lc�
The complete log4j manual: http://qos.ch/log4j/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
