On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 02:07:36 -0500, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Servlet's basically been inactive for a couple of years as there just > wasn't enough there to warrant a component. 2 methods in fact :) > > When we broke up the [util] project (lang, io, codec, various others > were all spawned), the code was filed under servlet and left until > more could join it. > > I'm happily +1 for your code to be added, but I suspect it would just > linger. We tend not to release code without unit tests, and I know > that I personally don't have any great itch to dig out a mock-servlet > implementation to get the methods tested.
My thought in suggesting this to Frank was that we might breathe life into the servlet component. ;-) As for mock objects, they already exist in the FileUpload component, and are used for its unit tests. I suspect HttpClient might have something too. Hmm, maybe that's fertile ground for a sandbox component, collecting the various testing bits and pieces from different components... -- Martin Cooper > Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
