At 05:53 PM 1/3/2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
nope (but don't ask me to find the references). distributing an api jar which requires runtime dependencies was a mistake. this issue hasn't arisen for quite a while since we try to keep quiet about the existing of the api jar.
I do not understand. How can JCL *not* require runtime dependencies given that it is a wrapper around various logging APIs? In other words, how can JCL wrap API x without runtime dependencies on API x?
- robert
-- Ceki Gülcü
The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
