DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32911>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32911 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-04 23:25 ------- It seems kind of awkward. My inclination would be to specify this in XML somehow. It would be easy enough to add a "className" attribute to catalog and chain which would be used as the type to instantiate; this is more burden if you want to repeatedly use the same alternate class, but is otherwise effective and available to the ChainListener but also other uses. We could also consider a "defaults" element which could wrap a block of config XML. A simple ObjectCreate/SetProperties rule could put a "Defaults" bean in the digester stack, and other rules which could peek back through the digester stack looking for the instance. If we did this, we would either have to require that it only wrap catalogs, or change the ConfigRegisterRule to look harder for a chain or catalog, instead of always assuming that it was the "top minus 1" object in the Digester stack. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
