On Thu, January 6, 2005 1:26 pm, Martin Cooper said: > In response to Craig's mention of the Preferences API earlier in this > thread, Daniel said: > > "The rules presented in the proposal make personalization decisions using > both user data and external rule configuration parameters. Both types of > data can be stored and accessed using the Preferences API, so I think this > is a great idea." > > So, since he said already that it's a great idea, I was simply > pointing out that I believe it works in all of the environments he > cares about, at which point it seems to me that we're done, and don't > need a new API / component for this.
Fair enough, I didn't put your comment in the proper context, I thought you were saying something more than you actually were. I wasn't trying to give you a hard time or anything :) For future reference, responses like yours to me can be boiled down to simply writing the following: In my best Eric Cartmans' mothers' voice: STOP BEING DIFFICULT ERIC! :) Frank
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
