I don't see how they could fail on a headed machine where they pass headless - it should be the other way around?
- Brett
Dion Gillard wrote:
It means we need to remember to pass in true when running the tests on a headed machine. Not ideal. Bearable short term tho.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:58:08 +1100, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yep. If this works, I'll follow it up with gump.
Any harm in this though? It still works in a headed env and only affects the tests.
- Brett
Dion Gillard wrote:
Isn't this supposed to be passed by the VM, not hardcoded by us?
On 19 Jan 2005 10:13:33 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
brett 2005/01/19 02:13:33
Modified: jelly/jelly-tags/swing project.properties Log: set headless for tests
Revision Changes Path 1.7 +2 -1 jakarta-commons/jelly/jelly-tags/swing/project.properties
Index: project.properties =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-commons/jelly/jelly-tags/swing/project.properties,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- project.properties 16 Aug 2004 01:14:04 -0000 1.6 +++ project.properties 19 Jan 2005 10:13:33 -0000 1.7 @@ -16,4 +16,5 @@ # ------------------------------------------------------------------- # P R O J E C T P R O P E R T I E S # ------------------------------------------------------------------- - +maven.junit.sysproperties=java.awt.headless +java.awt.headless=true
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
