Yes, but if it is working fine, there is rarely motivation to move "just because".Is httpclient 2.0 instantaneously disappearing when 3.0 is released?
Don't most projects think that way? There are some honorary
exceptions, but how often do you see "use 2.x instead" if users find a
bug in 1.x?
Gump does. There is a project descriptor for the httpclient 2.x branch, that you could build against.
<project name="commons-httpclient-2.0-branch">
Ok, sorry. I should have checked that first. I'll give that a try.
With Jelly approaching (finally) a 1.0 release, its really not the
time to be upgrading to beta dependencies :)
Understood.
So you are going to have a final release of forehead before that?
beta-5 is a final release - the code hasn't been touched since ;)
Actually, we've already discussed folding forehead into Jelly and getting rid of the dependency.
Cheers, Brett
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
