I just added a super-simple test case for the include tag to the core test
suite. Include is a special kind of tag, so hopefully it's the only one
leaking. Once we fix this problem, a retest will definitely be in order.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 9:47 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [jelly] Maven JSL memory leak and Jelly

Yup. AFAICT, it's been there since it's creation.

Do you need some additional info from me? I'm happy to try to make a smaller
test case and/or test with Maven later if required.

- Brett

Quoting Hans Gilde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> There's definitely a leak in the include tag. 
> 
> Brett, I'm guessing that this leak also exists pre-RC2, right?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 7:30 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [jelly] Maven JSL memory leak and Jelly
> 
> Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> 
> > Ideally, a test-case would be awesome, even if it refers to some  
> > far-away stylesheet...
> 
> I'll try and narrow it down first by cutting down site.jsl to the 
> minimum that leaks.
> 
> >
> > Can you try calling .clear() on the result of this
> >                 context.runScript(uri, output, isExport(), isInherit())
> > (and the other call).
> 
> so try with context.clear() inside IncludeTag? Ok, will try tomorrow.
> 
> >
> > Maybe that'll help.
> > In all cases, this context is gc-ed shortly after, I believe... so I  
> > see no reasons for big leaks at the tag-cache level.
> 
> It leaks 200k every time site.jsl is run, so should be easy to find, 
> right? :)
> 
> >
> > Also, maybe it would help to give more details where to go... I think  
> > this was reported about very long ago so maybe a distribution  
> > maven-1.0.2 or such should have this bug ?
> 
> easiest to run it against Maven's trunk really as it is compatible with 
> Jelly RC2 (RC1 was broken, so it currently uses beta-4 until RC2 is 
> released). RC2 won't work with Maven 1.0.x.
> 
> If you want to give it a go:
> - check out Maven from SVN and build:
>     svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-1/core/trunk 
> maven-1/core/trunk
>     svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-1/plugins/trunk 
> maven-1/plugins/trunk
> - build maven inside maven-1/core/trunk (see 
>
http://www.apache.org/~brett/maven-stage-site/developers/building-from-sourc
> e.html, 
> make sure you reassign a new MAVEN_HOME!)
> - run "maven xdoc" and watch memory go...
> - twiddle xdoc plugin and run "maven plugin:install" to test. Use the 
> memory tag lib I just added to jelly to test. <memory:gc/> and 
> <memory:showFree />.
> 
> Hopefully I'll have more information tomorrow, I'm going to bed now. I'm 
> keen to kill this before Jelly 1.0 if possible.
> 
> Thanks,
> Brett
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to