DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-01-27 09:11 -------
I changed the archive filesystems to put a list of _all_ childrens to _every_
child within the archive, thus, as long as you hold a strong reference to any of
the children the cache should not be invalidate.

Though it still doesnt work, someone holds a strong reference - its hard to
debug ...

However, it should work better than before - and I still think it IS the way to
go  if we wont introduce something like mount/unmount and even then we cant
simply use synchronize(fileobject) as then every thread has to get its own
fileobject instance.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to