B. K. Oxley (binkley) wrote:
Could you explain the tradeoffs between putting the RAM set into the
URI v. as an option to the configuration builder?
Your solution is just as good. But you have to ensure you really handle
it like the "host" within the other filesystems. The point is VFS has to
create a new filesystem instance for every "set", else all "sets" are
tied together in one filesystem and maybe never get garbage-collected as
someone might use a RamFS in an long time work.
---
Mario
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
