Can we not leave this until after 2.1?? Rushing something like this is a Bad Idea...
Stephen --- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 00:19:06 -0000, Stephen > Colebourne > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think that we would have to ask for classloader > advice ;-) > > Probably. > > > I suspect we would need: > > > > loadClassSystemClassLoader() - Class.forName > > loadClassThreadContextClassLoader() - thread > > loadClassLangClassLoader() - from ClassUtils > > loadClass(ClassLoader) > > We could just do the latter? Let's all the options > be used without us > having to drag through a list of all the likely > options. No matter > what classloader advice we got, it's likely to be > usable. > > Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
