(new thread on packaging) On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 05:34, Brian Stansberry wrote: > --- robert burrell donkin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip> > What I've found is documented at > http://xnet.wanconcepts.com/jcl/furtherAnalysis.html. we need to take a longer look into repackaging. i didn't expect that altering the distributions would work so well. i'd definitely be willing to review patches if someone wants to volunteer to alter the build, create some good test cases and write up some documentation. i'd always suspected that static binding was the only solution for several difficult cases (but using byte code engineering rather than selective compilation as used in UGLI). the sticking point for this (and many other cases i'd like to be able to address) is that LogFactory is too complex and too tightly coupled to a container environment. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
