On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 18:30 +0100, Ceki G�lc� wrote: > > On 2005-03-25 19:57:35, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > > > as part of a review of my demonstration of concepts analysis, i have > > now identified cases where (in theory) an impl jar should solve some > > issues involving child classloaders. (your batsense seems pretty well > > developed brian :) it's a little involved to explain without reference > > to the demonstration cases so i'll leave this as a FYI for now. > > Thanks for taking the time to write this document. I'll provide > comments early next week. Both you and Brian refer to my analysis of > JCL as "Ceki's document" without actually linking to it. Is it because > my document is so notorious that it does not need linking to? :-) > > Anyway, I don't mind either way. Feel free to keep as is.
i was in two minds whether to mention it at all. the demonstration stuff isn't a rebuttal but though i thought it might be polite to mention your document in there somewhere. ended up adding references to your examples in there for utility purposes (so they were listed somewhere). probably take them out once they have served their purpose. sounds like you'd be happy with a link so i've added one. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
