Hello:
I've committed some small clean ups in the text package which will not
be shipped in 2.1.
What I found while doing this is a code style inconsistency that I've
fixed locally but not committed yet. Since this involves style (religion
;-) I did not want to commit without posting here first:
Throughout [lang], some return statements are coded as the "standard":
return expression;
While others are coded as with extra C-style "(" and ")":
return (expression);
I did not find any pattern to either style. I removed extra "(" and ")"
in return expressions on my local store.
Is this a religious issue for some [lang]'ers out there or should I just
commit?
Thanks,
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 5:54 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
Proposing a vote to go ahead and release Commons Lang 2.1.
The release will pretty much match the release-candidate that is in:
http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.1/
Stephen's recent defaultIfEmpty method will be included in the release.
If the vote is successful, I'll target spending next weekend
performing the release (unless anyone wants to volunteer).
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
