DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34362>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34362 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-13 17:04 ------- One last note.. getBasePath(); this method currently returns different values based on if you started off with a URL or a String / filename. ie.. new PropertiesConfigurationFile("/mydir/myConfiguFile.properites"); would have a base path of /mydir/ but new PropertiesConfigurationFile ("file://mydir/myConfigurationFile.properties"); woul have a base path of file://mydir/ both instance however would still have a getURL method.. that would return a url full path. Since im proposing using the a URL as the internal base for file location basePath now has a new challenge. Do we still return different values based on how the configuration was initialized... ? or do we decide on a common form for base path.. lets say.. base path is now the path without protocol ie.. file:/mydir/myCOnfiguration.properties basepath is now /mydir/ same as if it was create using File(/mydir/myConfiguration.properties) :) and for those that need the URL base path..version we add a new method to the interface getURLBasePath(); which would return file:/mydir/myConfiguration even if you created the configuration using a string or file parameter.. (i know that was all a bit wordy.. sorry about that.. let me know your thoughts) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
