On 4/19/05, Mattias J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there an Apache standard for unit test code coverage? > It seems some projects use Clover and others jcoverage. Personally I have > experience with Emma (http://emma.sourceforge.net/). > If I want to add code coverage to a Commons project, is either of these > preferrable? > > Mattias Jiderhamn
There's no standard. Assuming all measure the coverage equally well, Clover has historically won for me because it is much nicer to use/look at. Emma was very new when I was getting addicted to Clover. Emma's obviously the nicest to use from a free point of view. JCoverage has a feature-limited GPL version while Clover has a free for open-source projects version, so they're about the same on the 'free' barometer for me. So I'd suggest Clover for its quality or Emma for its freedoom. There's now a Maven plugin for Emma and the ASF have a licence for Clover (see svn:/committers). Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
