DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29402>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29402 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-29 07:32 ------- Created an attachment (id=14879) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14879&action=view) Fixes this problem by using the fully-qualified class name as the attribute key for PageContext implicit objects This patch changes the attribute key for PageContext ImplicitObjects. I'm not entirely sure that changing the attribute name is the correct way to fix this Class incompatibility problem, but it has been working for me so far. On the other hand, if the two libraries need to share ImplicitObjects, then there should probably be a common interface, or a decision to use a common ImplicitObjects class from one or the other library. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
