DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34766>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34766 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 11:03 ------- Thanks for the prompt answer! I'll give it a try, and test which option is the easiest for me. My app is a standalone client, so I don't have issues with other components in the same JVM. As far as if "(String) parameters[i] doesn't generate a string when parameters[i] is null", well, I'm not as sure as you are that I knew it already :-). If you make me think about it, yes, it seems logical to me (that a cast doesn't generate an Object), but when I read the code I didn't noticed it. I was just thinking, "nulls shouldn't be converted, so the conditions shouldn't be in the if clause"... However, I didn't know that passing through ConvertUtils you can set your preferred defaults for the conversion. I think I'll test the Custom Converter first, and if I have time, try to add an option to CallMethodRule. So, on to the BeanUtils site I go! You can consider this to be a 'documentation bug', and close it with the javadoc correction. If you think it's worth it, you can make the flag thing an RFE with low priority. Thank you very much for your good work. Mauro Michele -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
