Howdy: The #1 issue I've personally had with working on VFS in the past - it's been a while - is building and testing. To me, documenting how to test, which FTP server to access or set up locally, etc would add much value. Maybe someone already doc'd that?
Gary -----Original Message----- From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:16 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [VFS][POLL] Get VFS out of sandbox now? Hi! Due to some user requests I would like to know if you think its possible to get VFS out of the sandbox. I think the main reason for the requests is to have releases and thus a stable api between the x.0 releases. Also it might be easier for me to implement changes as I am not forced to provide a working nightly build. Currently its a game of luck when picking up a nightly build for a production system. Currently there are 2 enhancements and 2 bugs filed in bugzilla Bugs: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34592 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34499 Even if not fixed they sholdnt be a show stopper for release 1.0 Yesterday I started to document how the setup of a VFS testserver (for development). Yes, ... no joke. I think it will be finished end of week. After this the documentation should be sufficient. Plan for the future (not ordered by importance) *) Implement a memory filesystem. Maybe based on http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33795 *) rework the caching model to allow VFS to run without any cache at all. *) extended ant tasks If there is consent I can start a voting. Thanks! --- Mario --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
