--- Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
> ok, so commons-openpgp would be ok. I'm still
> thinking commons-crypto is
> a good name, but I'll be happy with either. It can
> always be changed
> later when it is expanded I guess.
I like commons-crypto better personally though I won't
die over commons-openpgp.
[SNIP]
> As far as I understand, we're only aiming for
> something that wraps
> bouncycastle and/org cryptix (which, at least in
> BC's case from my
> experience, already does the crypto stuff very
> well) that is at a
> higher level and isolated from the provider's own
> API. We're just
> signing some deployments here, for now :)
I _want_ en/decryption support as well. Also, I see
no reason not to provide a backing library that calls
a gpg executable. This is GPL-kosher AFAIK (right?).
-Matt
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
