On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 15:26 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: > If BooleanConverter is the only converter with significant logic in id, > then maybe we would be better off enhancing BooleanConverter by adding a > constructor to take custom array of strings rather than allowing it to > be subclassed? Or maybe users could use the Decorator pattern rather > than subclassing to extend its functionality?
Ahem .. BooleanConverter *was* enhanced a while ago (after the bugzilla entry was created) to take an optional array of strings - by me. I thought that class name was familiar :-). They say failing memory is a sign of old age - which I'm feeling acutely at the moment as my birthday is less than a week away :-) Cheers, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
